chibichan: → mitsuki (fmws » this you can keep)
♕ Chibi ([personal profile] chibichan) wrote2013-02-01 01:02 pm

a rant on the film "Inception"

The past few days have been... weird. I've been feeling worse than usual health-wise and, because of it, I've missed all my lectures this week. Except reading some material for Property Law, I haven't done much this week. I feel like I should have done more, but I was feeling pretty bad and there's not much I could have done about it, so I'm not going to stress over it. I'm also feeling better today and I'm grateful for that.

I feel like there's a lot of stuff that I want to talk about (real life-wise and fandom-wise), but at the same time I don't know if these are 'spur of the moment' thoughts that will go away or if they're something I should really write down and get them off my chest. I guess I'll just wait and see if I still feel the need to write down this stuff.

Anyway, I watched Inception! Not sure I liked it though. I felt like the concepts of the movie were really interesting, but the way the movie was executed was just needlessly complicated and confusing. I understand the plot, I really do. I don't think the plot is hard to understand at all, actually - it's just the way they actually do it in the movie that raises questions and is kind of confusing.

I feel like there should have been more explanation about the whole process - not only the inception itself, but the whole 'getting into other people's dreams' business. How do they actually do it? When was it invented? Are there any limits to it? I wanted to know more about it. The movie sort of explained those bits, but mostly it just gave me the 'this happens, deal with it' vibe, where you just have to accept this is what happens, but I don't like it when movies do this. This is not a programming language, where stuff is the way it is just because, it's a film and you need to explain certain things to the people who feel the need to have those things explained. I can accept things are the way they are only up to a certain point.

Then I felt the explanations in the movie (the little bits there were here and there) were not done well. (I will use the actors' names because I don't remember any of the characters' names.) Like when Leonard di Caprio is teaching Ellen Page about the dream world, how to build dreams and of all that. I felt like Ellen Page already knew those things because she had learned the script, not because Leo was explaining it well. And I can't help myself but draw the parallels between this film and The Matrix trilogy (which I love). In the first Matrix movie, Neo was just like us - he was learning all this stuff about the world and the Matrix without knowing a single thing. And the explanations that Morpheus gave him in that movie made sense and were easy to grasp even for the audience - that's because Neo, the main character, had to make sure to really understand how stuff worked, otherwise the movies themselves would not work. The audience related to Neo, in the sense that they both were discovering the Matrix for the first time, and Morpheus's explanation was good and helpful and it made sure both Neo and the audience could follow the movies. In Inception, I did not relate to Ellen Page at all - it was quite obvious to me that she was 'getting' stuff because she had learned a script, not because her character was actually understanding anything. I certainly wasn't feeling like I was getting every bit of information. The dialogue was too short and was made of lots of one-line sentences that, put together, did not make any sense. Alienating the audience is about the worst mistake you can make when making a film.

Then there were just a bunch of plot-holes that I just can't ignore. Here's the list:

- This film is all about dreams, and yet I find it highly uninventive. Sure, the special effect of the city folding on itself was nice to look at, but... is that really the best you can do? You can dream up literally anything you want - so why would you not dream of dragons, super-advanced technology, other mythological creatures and so on? The dream world looked really boring to me.

The scene when they're being chased and shot at in the dream is a good example of this. So, the guy's 'defences' against dream-invaders (which brings yet another bunch of questions, like, why does he have mental defences against dream-thieves? Is it an ability you're born with? Do you train to get it? If so, what kind of training do you have to go through? etc.) is a bunch of mob guys with guns. Really? If it was me, I would choose something more effective and more creative, like, I don't know, how about a giant dragon? Or an army of werewolves? Heck, I bet even the Sailor Senshis would do a better job and would definitely be more creative than just a bunch of guys with guns. If you're going to train yourself so that people cannot infiltrate your dreams, why wouldn't you choose better security? It's not like it's the real world - you can just dream those things up in your mind and they will appear. So why not?

And the same thing goes for Leo and his team. If the guys with guns were really a problem for them, why not dream up some superpowers and beat them? Again, the dream world seems very limited, considering it's made of, y'know, dreams and supposedly anyone can dream anything.

- Why did they need Ellen Page's character at all? So that she could build the places they would go to in the guy's dream? How does that even work? When you go into somebody else's dream, aren't you going to be trapped in their dream? How do you make them dream something you made up instead? Surely, if you have the technology or the ability to make people dream anything that you want, inception shouldn't be as hard as the movie makes it look.

- The whole execution of the plan wasn't explained well. Why was it necessary to go through three different layers of dreaming to plant the idea in the guy's head? Why couldn't they do it on the first or second level? Also, the places where the dreams took places seemed really random. Why was the first level a street? Why was the second level of dreaming set in a hotel? And the third one, which is the one that really annoys me, why was it set on a snow mountain where it looks like they're shooting scenes for a Call of Duty movie?! Seriously, I really felt like I was watching someone play Call of Duty at that point in the movie. The 'sets' for the dreams were not explained and they really just looked like a bunch of action movies packed together.

- The whole concept of 'limbo' was not explained well either. So if you get injured in the dream and you don't back out of it in time, you go into limbo? Does your body go physically into a coma? And if the Japanese guy is really in so much danger, why the heck don't they just kill him and make him wake up?! He didn't do anything important in the dream anyway, he just joined in to make sure they were going to succeed, but he had nothing to do with their plan. Just have him wake up, it's not that hard or even dramatic.

- The plot and the characters were just not relatable at all and honestly, not even that dramatic. So you have a rich Japanese guy who wants to get rid of the competition on the market so that he can get even richer. Huh. Okay... good for you? I mean, who cares? A rich guy wants to get even richer. It's no 'the fate of the world rests in your hands' kind of thing. Why should I care about some douche who can't get enough of money? Or why should I care for Leonardo di Caprio's character? Because he's the main character? Nothing changes at the end of this film. Maybe that's the 'beauty' of it, but I just can't care about it. If anything, it makes me feel sad for the guy who gets the idea planted in his head, because it seems to me that he really didn't do anything bad to deserve it and they just tampered with his memory of his father's death, something which is very personal. This film gives me nothing and no one to care about - again, alienating the audience.

- So they used the guy's father's death to plant the idea that he had to be "his own man" and leave the company. Great. I have only one question though. You know how, when they're on the plane and Leo gives the guy his passport back, the guy just randomly tells him about his father's death, totally out of the blue? And then they used the father's death to plant the idea? Had the guy not told Leo about his father's death... how the heck were they going to do it?! It seemed like the father's death was the very essence of their plan, but they had no way of knowing about it until the guy just randomly said it five minutes before they started their plan. Isn't this kind of a huge plot-hole?

- No idea what's up with the ending. Leo is in limbo with the Japanese guy and then the Japanese guy says, 'Let's not be in limbo anymore' and they wake up. What just happened? How? Why? How did Leo go into limbo? Because he didn't exit his dream in time? Didn't you end up in limbo when you got an injury in the dream world and did not wake up? I got the impression that Leo supposedly died in the dream with his wife - shouldn't he have woken up then? Did he go into limbo because he stayed in the fourth layer of dream while he was drowning in the first layer? So how does that work? You wake up when you die, unless you're in a deeper layer of dreams? See, if the film had explained this stuff to me, I wouldn't be complaining - but it didn't, so of course I have tons of questions.

Drawing another parallel with The Matrix here - I know how the Matrix works. I know that you can bend reality if you can wrap your head around the concept that stuff doesn't really exist and it's all a bunch of data; and I know that if you get injured or die in the Matrix, you die in the real world, too. Simple enough and well explained. This whole 'limbo' thing in Inception? Not so much.

- If Leo's character is so dangerous because his wife always comes along and kills people... why don't they just tell him to stay out of the dream world?! Seriously. You've got this guy with his killer wife on the loose in his brain and you allow him to be in your dream operation? Why would you do that? That's just adding needless danger to an already dangerous situation. And don't tell me they didn't know about this - Ellen Page knows (and doesn't tell anyone, how nice of her) and the guy who appears at the beginning of the film who works with Leo (you know, the guy who fights in the hallway with no gravity for three hours) must know, because he has been working with Leo his whole life! It could be so simple. Just tell Leo to stay out of the dream. He could still work with them on the project before they went in the guy's dream and he could tell them what to do, just don't let him fall asleep. He didn't even do anything particularly important for the operation - while the guy was getting 'incepted' by watching his father, Leo was having a whole different dream with his wife and Ellen Page. He wasn't even there when the inception was happening!

- No idea what was up with the wife. What exactly did she hide in the safe and why? What did the token symbolise? Why did she have a spinning top as a token of all things? Absolutely no idea. Again, I can't care if I don't know the basic or the important stuff!

- Biggest plot-hole of them all: why couldn't Michael Caine just fly the kids over to wherever Leo was if Leo wanted to see his kids so bad? And would the American police/law system really just blindly declare Leo guilty of his wife's murder? Did the fact that the wife had not one, not two, but three psychiatrists/psychologists test her and make sure she was found sound of mind not tip anyone off? Were there no witnesses when she jumped off the building? Leo was screaming so loud, I'm sure someone must have opened their window or looked up the street to see what the hell was going on. I find this whole set-up somehow hard to believe.

So yeah... this post turned into an Inception rant, somehow. I didn't realise how much stuff I had to say about the film until I sat down and wrote it. Overall I felt like it was trying to be something 'deep' and 'amazing', but failed to explain its premise and the basics, not allowing me to really enjoy it. Sorry, Christopher Nolan. I love your Batman films, but this one really didn't do anything for me.

Anyway, if any of you guys wants to discuss the film, go ahead! I always love a good discussion. :D And if you have an answer or more to my questions, then feel free to post them! Maybe you'll help me fill the plot-holes!

Post a comment in response:

Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.